Objective: Write a table-move statement, account for indexes, and distinguish relocation from increasing existing storage capacity.
House-O-Pets has provisioned CUSTOMER_SPACE on approved additional storage. Move the customer table into that existing tablespace in the same Oracle 26ai application PDB. The destination's underlying file placement has already been verified; a tablespace name alone does not identify a physical disk.
Retain the legacy name CUSTOMER_OBJ_TABLE, but for this exercise assume an ordinary nonpartitioned heap-organized relational table, not an Oracle object table. It has conventional nonpartitioned B-tree indexes and no LOB, LONG, nested-table, or object-type columns. Specialized storage would require a separate plan.
Assume an approved maintenance window with application writes stopped, sufficient target space for the new segment, a writable destination, and appropriate table-alteration authority and owner quota. The existing indexes are valid. This is a written exercise; the website does not execute submitted SQL.
Submit numbered answers to all three questions:
Use an offline move for this scenario. An online move is not required. Review the actual table and index features before selecting any production procedure.
This exercise uses a 10-point rubric for self-review or instructor assessment. The website does not calculate a score automatically.
| Answer | Points |
|---|---|
| Correct MOVE statement (2), index-maintenance strategy (1), and verification query (1). | 4 |
| Explains a potential reorganization benefit (2) without promising automatic disk shrinkage or faster queries (1). | 3 |
| Explains growth options for both smallfile and bigfile tablespaces (2), subject to available capacity and applicable limits (1). | 3 |
Submit all three responses together to compare them with the reference solution.