Diagram Conventions   «Prev 

Understanding Crow's Foot Notation: A Comprehensive Guide

Crow's Foot Notation is a widely-used method for visualizing and designing database schemas. It provides a clear, intuitive way to represent entity-relationship models, which are crucial for understanding the structure and relationships of data in a database system.

Key Components of Crow's Foot Notation

  1. Entities and Attributes: In Crow's Foot Notation, an entity is represented as a rectangle and is typically a noun, such as `Customer` or `Order`. Each entity contains attributes, which are the properties or details of the entity. Attributes are shown as ovals connected to their entity.
  2. Relationships: Relationships describe how entities interact with each other. They are depicted as lines connecting entities. The 'crow's foot' symbol at the end of a line indicates a 'many' relationship, while a straight line signifies a 'one' relationship.
      Types of Relationships:
    • One-to-One (1:1): Indicates that one record in an entity relates to one record in another.
    • One-to-Many (1:M): Shows that a single record in one entity can be associated with multiple records in another.
    • Many-to-Many (M:N): Signifies that multiple records in one entity can relate to multiple records in another.
Advantages of Using Crow's Foot Notation

Creating an Entity-Relationship Diagram Using Crow's Foot Notation

Step-by-Step Process
  1. Identify Entities: Determine the main objects or concepts in the database.
  2. Define Attributes: List the characteristics or properties of each entity.
  3. Establish Relationships: Connect entities using lines and specify the type of relationship.
  4. Review and Refine: Ensure the diagram accurately represents the data structure and relationships.

Mermaid Diagram Example:
    CUSTOMER ||--o{ ORDER : places
    ORDER ||--|{ PRODUCT : contains
        string name
        string address
    ORDER {
        int orderNumber
        date orderDate
        string productName
        float price
Best Practices in Crow's Foot Notation
Crow's Foot Notation in Modern Database Design
Crow's Foot Notation remains relevant in modern database design due to its simplicity and effectiveness. It is used in various database management systems and modeling tools, making it a fundamental skill for database professionals. Crow's Foot Notation is an essential tool for database designers and developers. Its intuitive format and detailed representation of entity-relationships make it invaluable for creating efficient and accurate database schemas. By mastering this notation, professionals can enhance their database design capabilities and contribute to the development of robust data management systems.

Crow's Foot Notation exemplified via Diagram

A crow's foot is used to describe the "many" side of a one-to-many or many-to-many relationship, as highlighted in Figure 7-51. A crow's foot looks quite literally like the imprint of a crow's foot in the earth, with three splayed "toes." Many toes implies "more than one" and thus many, regardless of how many toes a crow actually has. Figure 7-51 shows a crow's foot between the AUTHOR and PUBLICATION tables, indicating a one-to-many relationship between AUTHOR and PUBLICATION tables.
A crow's foot represents the many sides of a one-to-many relationship.
Figure 7-51: A crow's foot represents the many sides of a one-to-many relationship.


One-to-one relationships are often created to remove frequently NULL valued fields from a table. They appear rarely in relational database models, unless in exceptional circumstances because the price of storage space is cheap. Figure 7-12 shows a one-to-one relationship between the EDITION and RANK tables such that for every EDITION entry, there is exactly one RANK entry, and visa versa.
A one-to-one relationship implies exactly one entry in both tables.
Figure 7-12: A one-to-one relationship implies exactly one entry in both tables.

Fourth Normal Form (4NF) addresses Multivalued Dependencies

Fourth Normal Form (4NF) primarily addresses multivalued dependencies, not one-to-one relationships or potential null values.
Here's a breakdown of the key concepts involved:
  • Fourth Normal Form (4NF): It's a level of database normalization that aims to eliminate multivalued dependencies. These occur when the presence of one set of values in a table implies the presence of multiple independent sets of values, potentially leading to data redundancy and anomalies.
  • Multivalued Dependencies: They are different from functional dependencies (which are addressed in BCNF) because a single value in one attribute can be associated with multiple independent values in another attribute.
  • One-to-One Relationships: These involve a direct association between two tables where each record in one table can have at most one matching record in the other table. They are not directly related to 4NF.
  • Null Values: While removing nullable fields might be a goal in some normalization efforts, it's not specifically a characteristic of 4NF.

When a 4NF transformation does involve creating one-to-one relationships, it's typically due to:
  • Separating Independent Data: Splitting a table with a multivalued dependency into multiple tables, where each table holds a distinct set of related data, can sometimes result in one-to-one relationships between those tables.
  • Isolating Optional Data: If a multivalued dependency involves optional data that's not always present, it might be extracted into a separate table with a one-to-one relationship to maintain data integrity and avoid potential null values in the main table.

Key Points to Remember:
  • 4NF is primarily concerned with multivalued dependencies, not one-to-one relationships or null values.
  • It's a step beyond BCNF in normalization, aiming for a higher level of data consistency and reducing anomalies.
  • One-to-one relationships can sometimes emerge as a result of 4NF transformations, but they're not the defining characteristic.

One-to-many Relationships

One-to-many relationships are extremely common in the relational database model between tables. Figure 7-14 shows that an AUTHOR table record can have many publications because an author can publish many books (PUBLICATION record entries). Figure 7-14: One-to-many implies one entry to many entries between two tables.
One-to-many implies one entry to many entries between two tables.
Figure 7-14: One-to-many implies one entry to many entries between two tables.

Many to Many

A many-to-many relationship means that for every one record in one table there are many possible records in another related table, and visa versa (for both tables). The classic example of a many-to-many relationship is many students enrolled in many courses at a university. The implication is that every student is registered for many courses and every course has many students registered. The result is a many-to-many relationship between students and courses. This is not a problem as it stands; however, if an application or end-user must find an individual course taken by an individual student, a uniquely identifying table is required. Note that this new table is required only if unique items are needed by end-users or an application.
In Figure 7-16, from left to right, the many-to-many relationship between PUBLISHER and PUBLICATION tables is resolved into the EDITION table. A publisher can publish many publications and a single publication can be published by many publishers. Not only can a single publication be reprinted, but other types of media (such as an audio tape version) can also be produced. Additionally those different versions can be produced by different publishers. It is unlikely that a publisher who commissions and prints a book will also produce an audio tape version of the same title. The purpose of the EDITION table is to provide a way for each individual reprint and audio tape copy to be uniquely accessible in the database.
One-to-many implies one entry to many entries between two tables.
Figure 7-16: Resolving a many-to-many relationship.

SEMrush Software